Translate

Friday, July 14, 2017



The Shift

Society is shifting back to favoring religion over science. This is why Turkey will no longer teach evolution in its schools. This is why the US is turning to private schools where religion of choice can be taught without having to include any science to back it up. Where the science of climate change is openly challenged and people turn their back on anything that makes their religious perspective something to think about.

Just as in the days of Galileo’s persecution where it was considered heresy to say anything against the church; people are once again creating a mindset of stubborn imbalance. They look upon our world and can’t handle the idea that perhaps science can truly explain the mysteries of life. In their minds that creates a conflict because ..how can there be a mystery if we have solved it …how can God still exist if we understand how the multiverse works? They fear the two cannot co-exist. This fear causes a rise in religious extremism. People turn violent trying to prove to others that their spiritual experiences are real. They try to convince themselves that if only everyone else would see God through their eyes the world would be a better place.

On the flip side, if we were to embrace just the scientific and forget the spiritual aspect of existence we would discover what we have already lived during the Industrial Revolution…mankind begins to turn its back on the planet altogether and simply looks for and takes anything we can find to make our lives easier and fatter. We suck up every resource until there is none left, until we have drained the mother dry. We watch as wars manifest over who has and who has not, we see cities crumble, we see species fall and become extinct, we watch the sea rise and the sky burn just so we can have more. Our thirst is never quenched because we have left our purpose, our meaning of life, behind. We have forgotten our duty to the earth and our spirit suffers because of the disconnect. We are left untethered to the tree of life, floating adrift in our armchairs.

The brief moment of the enlightenment era and a few other times…perhaps the industrial age…the dawn of the bronze age, the iron age…ect…these are moments when mankind embraced their intellectual gifts but they failed to fully incorporate spirit. We took our science and creative knowledge and waged war, made better weapons, created a life of leisure for ourselves, when we should have used this knowledge to tend to our responsibility of caring for the earth. With each failure to recognize our responsibility the human race is set back again, like being trapped in Newton’s Cradle, we bounce back and forth between religion and science; history repeats itself. After a period of intellectual boom we realize that we have cut ourselves off from spirit and then swing back to regain the connection. We long to get it right but as a collective society we tend to be led by extremists.

Picture Newton’s Cradle as a demonstration of society… the two outer balls represent the extremes of religion and science with most people somewhere in middle. The outer balls feed off the energy of the balls in the middle but what many forget, or don’t understand, is that the middle balls are also feeding and delivering energy to each other. This is why people in shamanistic cultures understand that they can give or receive energy, wanted or not, to other people they encounter. The effect of this energy can then be carried through society as with Newton’s Cradle and cause the pendulums to swing one way or the other. Western culture has forgotten this, or cares not to consider it, which may well be the reason for so much illness – spiritually, physically, mentally, and emotionally. As the energy ripples through society the pendulums swing and the middle balls both give and receive the energetic flow.

What does this mean for us? Because we are stuck in this back and forth pattern between religion and technology, we suffer as a population and we take the earth and its inhabitants with us. We should be using our spiritual sense to guide us into what needs to be done to keep the planet safe and then use our science to accomplish this. We were given our intelligence so that as stewards of the earth we can create and manage what needs to be done. We have lost that sense of responsibility and that has resulted in a dis-spiriting of the collective, which in turn allows technology and intelligent thought to run a muck…this is why we have greed, war, and power struggles. Then, when it gets to be too much for the collective to handle anymore we are thrown back to the spiritual but most people look at the spiritual through the eyes of a specific religion…this creates the religious conflicts and persecution of those who are of different faiths or those who favor science. We must, as a collective find the balance between the spiritual and the scientific before we will be able to guide, and act as stewards, to the planet. If this cannot be achieved we will not be given the opportunity to proceed, grow, or develop as a race….we will remain trapped in the cradle until we have depleted our energy, destroying ourselves and our charge.

As we swing back and forth the results we see are science and technology being used to damage our charge; such as in the case of fracking, burning coal, and using pesticides, or becomes one of genocide, persecution, and religious war because each religious group believes it has the proper answer. However, the answer lies in the middle ground, in the compromise; we need to leave religion to the individual, allowing them to truly find their own spirit path. We need to use our intellect collectively to find a way to save our planet by managing our resources and distributing them in a manner that allows each living entity its proper place and respect. We’re a bunch of smart cookies but our fear of responsibility and our belief in manifest destiny is dooming us all.

If people would come to understand that the spirit world will always have its mysteries because the human mind will never just stop wondering if there’s more to life, while seeing that the natural world is full of the tangible promise of discovery and has been given to us to guard and care for; we would come to a proper balance and escape the cradle. I must believe that such a task would not be given to someone who is incapable of fulfilling it. We can do this by using science and logical thought which is guided by spirit. These are the gifts granted us by spirit. They have given us a way to tend to our responsibility but mankind has been afraid of taking that step, so they revert. Such is the case throughout history.


If we want to regain our life purpose, our feeling of accomplishment, and our meaning for life then we need to first recognize and embrace the knowledge that is within us…we are here as stewards of this planet. It is our life’s work, our purpose to care for her and all her inhabitants; to make her healthy and fruitful. When we see this, and embrace it we can be free to use all that is within our grasp to fulfill our task. We can combine our scientific knowledge and our spiritual experience to finally achieve true wisdom. And, after all what is wisdom but the ability to use our knowledge properly. Spirit and Science together… Spirituality for the individual – Science for the whole. In the end, we can save the planet and while we’re at it, we’ll save ourselves.

Monday, June 19, 2017

The Value of Life

Picture Courtesy Of - Anny Cecilia Walter


What determines the value of life? Are humans more important than animals? Is an unborn baby’s life more important than the mother’s? What about a terrorist, is their life equal to the victim of their attack?

I say they are all of equal standing, that life, no matter what or whose it is are all on equal ground. How can I claim this? How can I possibly think that the life of a terrorist is equal to that of an innocent child? I can claim this because I am speaking only of the life itself and not of the emotional value that I place upon it.

The separation of the two, life and the emotional values that one attaches to a particular life, are very different matters. The life of those closest to me, the people I have an emotional attachment to are going to be far more valued to me than someone of whom no emotional attachment has been made. I will certainly feel the life of my daughter is more important than the life of a stranger but this is not because my daughter’s life is truly more important. To the stranger’s family the stranger’s life will be the one taking precedent. The emotions connected to the lives we encounter determine their worth to us.

Can an animal be just as important as a human family member? Yes. The emotional value placed on the animal by a person can be just as deep and complicated as one’s connection to a member of the same species. If that person has developed complex emotional ties to another living being the value they place on that being’s life is every bit as real as the value they have placed on a human’s.

It can be difficult to separate our emotions from one living being to another. This is why some living beings will fight to the death to protect the ones they love. Their emotional investment is so deep they are not able to see beyond the love that they feel. They would rather suffer the pain of death than see or be aware of the suffering of the one they are invested in.

All of this though, is illusory. It doesn’t change the actual value of the life at stake. If a person were made to choose between the death of a loved one and the death of a stranger, it would be expected that they would choose to save the one they love. If, however, that same person was made to choose between two people they had never met and knew nothing about, it would render the person indifferent as to who should die. While they may feel abhorrent about having to make the choice, without an emotional value attached to either person the choice is strictly pragmatic.

If each life, then, is measured by the emotional value placed upon it, the causes we fight for; the rights of the unborn, those on death row, the starving children, those suffering from medical ailments, animals being senselessly slaughtered…all of it…becomes an illusion. The reality of it is that no one life is more important than any other, it is our emotional attachments that create the illusion in our minds that one life is more important than another.

Therefore, holding this to be true; if humans could set their emotions aside and detach from the causes they have become emotionally invested in, they should be able to place an equal standard onto all living beings. By doing so, they then should be able to step back and truly see life on even ground. Once this has been accomplished the emotional investment they had prior can then be reapplied creating a deeper appreciation of the love they had to begin with while continuing to hold an understanding and equal reverence for all life no matter how unassuming it may be.

It is essential for a human being to be able to remove oneself from emotional attachment in order to truly appreciate the emotional attachments they have. Any failure to do this leaves a person in the illusory state which causes them to mistakenly believe that one life is more precious than another and that death is acceptable for a being of lesser value. If we choose to rest in this illusion then it seems doubtful that we will ever be able to rise above our emotional selves making it impossible to discover a higher potential, a higher self within one’s self. As the human race has, for centuries, sought to become more civilized, more understanding and caring, more aware of the needs of those around us I would suggest that it has become even more important now to detach emotionally so as to re-sensitize, or reset, our emotional compass.

By no means am I saying that we should become emotionless. I would not advocate turning one’s self into a cold, empty vessel. It may seem an oxymoron but by detaching from our emotional investments we become more open to being emotionally invested on a larger scale. Creating an emotional detachment happens by consciously acknowledging our emotional attachments for what they are, an emotional investment we have made. We must understand our emotional investments so that we become capable of recognizing when our connection with someone is causing a prejudice response toward another, thereby devaluing the other’s life. By doing this, senseless loss of life will come to an end.

Every living being wants to continue to live. Ask yourself this, why does the zebra run from the lion? It does so because it understands that it will die if it is caught….and well, no one wants to be a meal. Prey wouldn’t run from predators if they didn’t want to live. It is the most basic instinct of the living…survival. From plant life to us everything that is alive will do all in its power to stay alive. With this ingrained so deeply throughout the cosmos how can one possibly believe that their right to exist outweighs the right of another?

The value of a life is simply this…it’s alive. Working to truly understand this on the most primal level can alter a perspective and create a deeper sense of compassion. With a deep compassion comes the ability to value all life equally which in turn allows a person to live in better harmony with other living beings. When more people are living in harmony the world becomes a better place. If you want the world to be better, release your emotional ties by accepting that the values you place on life are due to the emotional investments you have made throughout your lifetime. Once this has been accomplished your compassion for all living beings will increase and you will be a better person, creating a better world.

Friday, February 10, 2017

The Disrespecting of Donald Trump


I have always been taught that respect is earned. It is earned mutually through the process of building trust, offering compassion, and understanding the views of others – especially if those others are in a position of subordination.

That said, I believe a dangerous precedent is being established which is undermining the structure of the United States of America and, due to our ranking in the political realm, the world. In my opinion, Donald Trump has not met the criteria for earned mutual respect.

I have watched Donald Trump’s displays throughout his campaign and his Presidency thus far. I have yet to witness a sincere act of respect for any person or thing. I believe he completely lacks the ability to feel true respect for anyone, let alone those who offer a different opinion. However, he fully expects and demands that every living being on earth (possibly beyond) show him the respect he believes he is entitled to.

Americans believe that our forefathers were men of honor, respect, and dignity. We have been taught that the office of the president is one which shares those same qualities. Let me ask you this, have you ever been witness to a boss who yells at and belittles his employees in front of everyone? My guess is that you probably have, because people like that exist. Did you find yourself thinking, “Wow! What a jerk!” My guess, again, is that you did. So, this is why I don’t understand how the good people of this country, people I have come to respect, can be alright with Trump’s actions. The way I see it he is belittling anyone who feels or thinks differently and is doing it very publicly and well…”Wow! What a jerk!”

Do you see? I may have varied opinions on the policies of this administration. I may choose to speak my mind against some of them or I may even choose to support a particular stance, but that is irrelevant. My issue here is that I cannot, in good conscience, support any person that I do not respect. I wouldn’t respect the boss who is belittling his employees in public any more than I can respect the President who belittles the very people he is responsible for. Without that respect I cannot trust him. I cannot feel a great deal of compassion for him. I cannot believe that he has the ability to understand the issues of those dependent on him, or that he even truly cares about them.

I feel that Donald Trump’s disrespect for our system of government is obvious. He believes he is entitled to do what he wants when he wants. When he is questioned via the legitimate processes of balances and checks established by our forefathers, he offers public condemnation and mockery to those opposing him. It upsets me that there are people in this world who are alright with this behavior. Personally, I think it’s bad enough coming from any one person but coming from the President of the United States, well…it’s downright shameful. How can I be expected to give a man a “chance” when he clearly disrespects me? How can you?